:::

學術成果

:::
論文內容
論文分類94
學號 
姓名余佳穎
標題 以凱利方格技術探討大學教師對科學研究的看法
指導教授靳知勤
畢業日期2006-06
附件檔案 
參考連結http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=MQUyqb/record?r1=1&h1=28
摘要本研究旨在探討一位大學教師對於科學研究的看法,採凱利方格技術晤談法進行,對象為一位任職於大學的科學教師,其教學與研究經驗已有七年。訪談過程分兩個階段進行,第一階段為分類三元素組,由研究者直接提供12個元素,進行55組的分類訪談,在第一階段訪談之後,研究者將訪談資料整理成構念,並將元素與構念製作成方格,進行相關評比,數據資料回收後,進行階層群集分析,得到元素的相關分佈以樹狀圖呈現為結果。第二階段為將第一階段整理之初步構念分析結果給予教師檢核,並刺激其能有更進一步地思考,之後再給予教師元素之樹狀圖分佈的結果,
參考文獻一、中文文獻
王靜如、張靜儀(2001)。教師科學本質觀、教學信念與教學實務之研究。屏東師院學報,14,859-898。
吳大猷(1986)。科學與科學發展。台北:遠流出版公司。
吳芝儀(1997)。以建構研究法探討個人建構系統與生涯決定的相關論題。輔導季刊,33(3),42-51。
林陳涌、楊榮祥(1998)。利用凱利方格晤談法探討教師對科學本質的觀點—個案研究。科學教育學刊,6(2),113-128。
林潔斌、林川雄、劉明德、飛捷工作室著(2004)。SPSS12:統計建模與應用實務。台北:博碩文化。
許良榮、柯玉婷(2001)。台中地區國小職前與在職教師對科學本質的理解與教學態度之研究。台中師院學報,15,335-361。
許宏彬(1997)。個人建構心理學在生涯諮商上之評量與應用。輔導季刊,33(4),1-11。
許榮富(1989)。科學教育目標之探討與展望。教育研究集刊,14,41-55。
張雲景、賴礽卬譯(2003)。SPSS統計軟體的應用(11.0版)。台北:華騰文化。
黃俊儒、楊文金(1997)。觀點論對於科學教育的意涵。科學教育月刊,196,9-22。
楊文金、黃克雄(2000)。個人建構論基本理念。民國95年2月22日,取自:http://scied.gise.ntnu.edu.tw/sta/www/rgt/pctintroduction.htm
楊文金(2000)。凱利方格法。民國95年2月22日,取自:http://scied.gise.ntnu.edu.tw/sta/
溫家男(2002)。高中生物科實習與資深教師發問策略之個案研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所,碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
鍾敏綺、張世忠(2002)。奠基於建構主義的STS於自然與生活科技領域之運用。科學教育月刊,254,2-15。
二、外文文獻
Aikenhead, G.S.& Ryan,A.G.(1992).The development of a new instrument:”View of Science-Technology-Society”(VOSTS). The Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
Aikenhead, G.S.(1994a). The social contract of science: implication for teaching science. In G.S. Aikenhead & J.Solomon (Ed.), STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform(11-20). New York and London: Teachers College Columbia University.
Aikenhead, G.S.(1994b). What is STS science teaching? In G.S. Aikenhead & J.Solomon (Ed.), STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform(21-28). New York and London: Teachers College Columbia University.
Aikenhead, G.S. & Otsuji, H. (2000). Japanese and Canadian science teachers’ views on science and culture. Journal of Science Education, 11, 277-299.
BouJaoude, S.(1996). Epistemology and Sociology of Science According to Lebanese Edu1cators and Students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (St. Louis, MO, March 31-April 3). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED394848).
Cobern, W.W.(1991). World view theory and science education research. Manhattan, Kas.
Cobern, W.W.(1993). World view, Metaphysics, and Epistemology: Scientific literacy and cultural studies project, working paper NO.106. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (Atlanta, CA, April).
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED361204).
Cobern, W.W., Gibson, A.T. & Underwood, S.A.(1995). World view investigations and science education: a synopsis of methodology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (San Francisco, CA, April).
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED388501).
Cobern, W.W.(1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80(5), 579-610.
Cobern, W.W.(1998).Science and a Social constructivist view of Science Education. In W.W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-Cultural Perspectives on Science Education (1-5). Dordrecht Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cobern, W.W. & Loving, C.C. (2001). Defining “Science” in a multicultural world: implication for science education. Science education, 80, 50-71.
Cobern, W.W. & Loving, C.C. (2002). Investigation of preservice elementary teachers’ thinking about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1016-1031.
Dpnaghue, H.(2003). An instrument to elicit teachers’ beliefs and assumptions. ELT Journal, 57(4), 344-351.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. & Holman, D. (1996). Using repertory grids in management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(3), 3-30.
Haidar, A.H. (1999). Emirates teachers’ view on the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 807-822.
Harrison, A.J. (1987). Roles of scientists, engineers and the public in the resolution of societal issues. Ethics and Social Responsibility in Science Education, 37-41, Pergamon Press.
Hurd, F.D.(1991). Closing the educational gaps between science, technology, and society. Theory Into Practice, 4, 251-259.
Jegede, O.J.(1993). African cultural perspectives and the teaching of science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED365526).
Jegede, O.J. & Aikenhead, G. S. (1999). Trabscending cultural borders: implications for science teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(1), 45-66.
Kranzberg, M.(1991).Science-Technology-Society: It’s as simple as XYZ. Theory Into Practice, 4, 234-241.
Kurz, T., Middleton, J. & Yanik, H. B.(2004). Preservice Teachers Conceptions of Mathematics-Based Software. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 28th (Bergen, Norway, July 14-18).( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED489587)
Leach, C., Freshwater, K., Aldridge, J. & Sunderland, J.(2001).Analysis of repertory grids in clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 225-248.
Lewis, B.F.(1998). A review of worldview research in education: analyzing theory, methods and application. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (San Diego, CA, April 13-17). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED465551).
Lunn, S.(2002). “What we think we can safely say…”:primary teachers’views of the nature of science. British Educational Research Journal, 28(5), 649-672.
Marsden, D. & Littler, D.(1998).Repertory grid technique: An interpretive research framework. European Journal of Marketing, 34(7), 806-834.
Merryfield, M.M.(1991). Science-Technology-Society and global perspectives. Theory into Practice, 4, 288-293.
Neimeyer, G.J. & Tolliver, R.(2002). The effects of construct examples on the content and structure of personal construct systems. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 15, 127-138.
Parkinson, B. & Lea, M. (1991). Investigating personal constructs of emotions. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 73-86.
Rugumayo, E.B.(1987). Science education and the needs of developing countries. In E.B. Rugumayo (Ed.), Science and Technology Education and Future Human Needs (81-93), Pergamon press.
Siraj-Blatchford, J.(1995). Kelly’s repertory grid: a technique for developing evaluation in design and technology. Unpublished papers, Oxford: Westminster College.
Solomon, J.(1994). Knowledge, values, and the public choice of science knowledge. In G.S. Aikenhead & J.Solomon (Ed.), STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform (99-110). New York and London: Teachers College Columbia University.
Splittgerber, F.(1991). Science-Technology-Society Themes in Social Studies: Historical Perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 30(4), 242-250.
Steed, A. & McDonnell, J.(2003). Experiences with Repertory Grid Analysis for Investigating Effectiveness of Virtual Environments, Unpublished papers.
Tairab, H.H. (2001). Pre-service teachers’ views of the nature of science and technology before and after a science teaching methods course. Research in Education, 65, 81-87.
Waldrip, B.G. & Taylor, P.C.S.(1994). Permeability of students’ world views to their school views. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching(Anaheim, CA, March 26-29). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED369645).
Walter, O.B. (ED.)(2004). A Proposal For A Common Data Exchange Format For Repertory Grid Data. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17, 247–251.
Yager, R.E.(1995). Science/Technology/Society: A reform arising from learning theory and constructivist research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Assocation(San Francisco, CA, April 18-22).(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED382481).
Yeung , K.W. & Watkins, D. (1998). Hong Kong student teachers’ personal construction of teacher efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED439111).
Ziman, J. M. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
cron web_use_log